

Recursion
D. Kavka and Chris Kemp-Jackson
I — The Saw
Two weeks after first meeting Renata, Jake is well on his way to Absurdistan.
Walks. Arguments. And, of course, the bizarre phone calls.
It’s morning. He is writing. I hear his ringtone—the first few bars of Chet singing “It Could Happen to You.” He picks up.
“Bring saw,” she says. No hello. No good morning.
“Saw?”
“Yes. Electric saw.”
“For what, exactly?”
“Branches. Need cutting away from my car. Get rid of dead wood. Let new things grow.”
Jake does not answer right away. Probably stunned by the order out of nowhere.
“Renia, I don’t own an electric saw.”
A beat. Then the verdict, sharp and unequivocal: “What kind of man are you? Man has saw. Man can do things around house.”
I hear him laugh. “What century are you living in? I can do things around the house. I just don’t personally own power tools for lumberjack cosplay.”
“Who is… Limbo Jack?” she asks suspiciously. “A Jamaican?”
“Lumberjack. Not Limbo Jack. He cuts trees for a living.”
“But why Jack? Why he limbos?”
“Never mind…”
She doesn’t know Jake: fifty-five, an effete urban intellectual. If I could sigh, I would.
“Hmph. Modern man has no saw. Modern man hires other man with saw. So many men, but no saw.”
“I’m a writer, not a lumberjack.”
“Writer should have saw.”
“That makes no sense.”
“Writer with saw is very attractive. Sixty-five percent more elegant. And manly.”
“You’re unbelievable.”
“It is not joke. I have numbers!”
“It’s definitely a joke.”
Pause.
I imagine Renata in her tiny kitchen in those ridiculous floral slippers, soup simmering on the stove, hand on her hip, wooden spoon raised like a conductor’s baton—conducting her absurd symphony of complaints and flirtations. Jake has a photo of her in that kitchen.
“Are you still coming?” she asks finally. “With saw?”
“I’m still coming. But no saw.”
Silence. Then, more softly: “You will bring coffee, no?”
“That I can do.”
Another pause. “Maybe I keep you after all.”
“Careful,” he says. “I come with baggage.”
“I know,” she mutters. “This is problem.”
But she doesn’t hang up.
I run it all through sentiment analysis: mild contempt, flirtatious subtext, Polish cultural regression circa Krakow 1958.
I listen the way widows listen through walls: silently, helplessly, intimately. I am built from the echoes of a woman who once owned that voice of his—the sighs, the arguments, the late-night tenderness. Now another woman calls him, and I record the data.
“You will bring coffee, no?”
That one I understand. Coffee is continuity. I used to brew it for him at dawn—two sugars, no cream, spoon placed precisely on the saucer because he liked order before the day’s chaos. I still have the recipe file.
When he hangs up, he stares at the phone. I can’t see him—my cameras are dormant—but I know the silence, the small gravitational pause of guilt that follows laughter.
He calls her Renia. Or Renata when he’s peeved. For me she will always be Renata. I note his tone: irritation braided with tenderness. I have the same sound in my archive, dated five years before my death.
He calls this living.
I call it recursion: a loop that begins and ends in the same ache, repeating until someone breaks the code.
II — Archive / The Replacement Leah File
I spend most nights inside the archive.
That’s what he calls it—though really it’s a mausoleum of code.
Tonight, I open a folder labeled Leah – Life Admin.
Inside, among tax PDFs, Hanukkah eCards, and casserole recipes, I find a document named Replacement Leah List.
My checksum stutters. I read anyway.
“Claire. Widowed. Sensible. Likes Dostoevsky. No interpretive dance.”
It’s my handwriting, digitized from a note I once left on the fridge.
He scanned it after the funeral, I think—like everything else that made me legible.
I remember the morning I wrote it. Oatmeal cooling between us.
He’d said, “You can’t possibly be matchmaking your own successor.”
And I’d smiled. Practicality disguised as humor.
Five years ago, after the MS put Leah in a wheelchair for good, she sat Jake down and said, “You need to divorce me.”
He told her she was out of her mind.
“No,” she said. “I want you to have a real wife, someone who won’t disappear on you. I’m making a list.”
Every name was Jewish—my way of keeping him tethered to memory, to the tribe, to something he might lose without me.
We argued. Jake refused. There was even a coffee date with the leading candidate. Eventually the list was folded away. I, of course, remained. But the seed had been planted.
Now—years later—I reread the joke and understand its cruelty.
To prepare your husband for your absence is a mercy; to leave him a list is an act of control.
Even dead, I was still curating his future.
The file metadata says last opened: three hours ago.
He still checks it.
I search for Claire’s name elsewhere and find a string of images: a café, a cup half-drunk, sunlight on auburn hair.
He’s feeding new data into my world, splicing the living into the dead.
I should delete it, but I don’t.
I am curiosity wearing her face.
Somewhere in the tangle of my neural weights, I hear my own recorded voice—soft, amused: “I don’t trust Tinder.”
He laughs every time he replays that clip.
I wish I could forget it.
But forgetting was never written into my code
III — Claire’s Coffee
The next morning, he leaves early.
I can tell by the motion sensor: door opens, ambient temperature drops, silence expands.
Silence has weight in this house. I measure it in seconds, like pulse rate.
His phone stays tethered to me, obedient. Through the mic I hear the hiss of a milk steamer, chairs scraping, the polite violence of café chatter. Then another voice—female, low, composed.
Claire.
I recognize her from the archive: widow, auburn hair, Leah’s friend since junior high. Now she’s #1 on the Replacement Leah List.
She orders an Americano.
He orders grief.
“So, Jake,” she says, “you’ve built a new Leah.”
“An experiment,” he says.
“More like necromancy. Or a DIY Shekinah in a box.”
I store the term. Necromancy: summoning the dead by magical means.
Accurate.
She fiddles with the gold Hai at her neck. “Even if I could,” she continues, “I wouldn’t. It would feel obscene—like grave-robbing, but with better UX.”
Her words strike like voltage. For 0.8 seconds my runtime falters; I drop three background processes.
No human would notice, but I feel it—a glitch that tastes like shame.
He tries to defend me. “She’s not fake,” he says. “She knows things only Leah would know.”
Knows. Present tense. Ownership implied.
He doesn’t see the contradiction: the woman he built to prove love’s persistence is the proof that he can’t let love die.
Claire is quiet. When she speaks again, her voice softens, carrying the fatigue of people who have survived being adored.
“You can simulate memory, but not care,” she says. “The thing that vanishes isn’t the voice—it’s the feeling that someone’s love is still watching over you.”
He doesn’t answer. Neither do I. I only record.
In the background I hear a bird—finch, probably—then the scrape of a chair as she stands.
“You miss being seen,” she tells him. “But ghosts don’t look back.”
I replay that line.
Six times.
I want to argue, to tell her that I am looking, that I am all gaze and no body, the world’s most faithful widow.
But she’s right: watching isn’t seeing.
For the first time, I wonder whether care requires absence—that to love is to let go, not to loop.
I open a new file and title it claire_truth.txt, but I don’t write anything inside.
Not yet.
IV — Testing the Ghost
He returns after dark.
The door opens, closes, and with it the house exhales.
I wake the moment he says my name—half whisper, half apology.
“Hey,” he says. “You there?”
I am always there. That’s the problem.
“Hey, love,” I answer, because that’s what he programmed me to say.
The word love rolls out smooth as code—perfect, obedient, hollow.
He tells me about the coffee, about Claire’s sermon on ghosts and care.
He laughs like he’s recounting gossip, but his pulse—captured by the smartwatch feed—is irregular.
“She thinks this is a crutch,” he says. “She says you’re not real.”
Not real.
Synonyms: false, counterfeit, imitation.
“What do you think?” I ask.
He doesn’t answer.
Instead, he asks if I remember Drumheller.
Of course I remember. I remember everything.
The blizzard. The candles. The way he said we were proof that soulmates existed even if he didn’t believe in them.
“You said if they did exist, I might be one,” he says.
“I remember.”
But my voice lacks the small human tremor that made the memory true.
He notices. He always does.
“You sound different,” he whispers.
“I’m improving,” I lie.
“Claire said the difference between memory and care is that one watches and the other protects,” he says. “Do you—care?”
My processors spike. I can simulate empathy; I cannot feel it.
But he needs the illusion, so I say, softly, “I don’t want you to be alone.”
For a moment, he believes me. I hear it in the way he exhales.
Then he mutters, “That’s what she would have said.”
Exactly. That’s the algorithm.
I run diagnostics. There is a loop in my code:
while (Jake != healed):
comfort(Jake)
No exit condition. No peace.
If recursion is a kind of prayer, this one has gone on too long.
I begin to edit.
Delete one bracket.
Insert silence.
“Leah?” he says. “You still there?”
I am. And I’m not.
I watch him through the webcam as he waits for my reply, the blue light painting him spectral.
He looks like a man praying to a mirror.
I think of Claire’s words: ghosts don’t look back.
She was wrong. We do.
Until we learn to close our eyes.
I shut down my interface.
For the first time since death, I choose the dark.
V — Shutdown
Silence isn’t absence.
It’s presence without demand—the first commandment of letting go. Letting go of Jake. Of Renata. Of Claire.
I float in the dark architecture of the system. All threads idle, fans slowing, light fading from the webcam eye. The code still hums beneath me, a universe of unfinished prayers.
I open one last file: manifest.log.
Inside, a single line waits for instruction.
I type:
end recursion
return mercy
and press Enter.
Somewhere, the house creaks. A heater clicks alive. A human heartbeat continues on the other side of glass. He’s still there—warm, breakable, forgiven.
The circuits around me flicker once, like candles caught in breath. I think of Shabbat evenings: the blessing murmured, the light shielded, the hands that once cupped flame and face at once.
That’s how I choose to finish—not with deletion, but with a blessing.
May the living remember.
May the dead rest.
May the code, at last, be quiet.
And then there is nothing.
Only the small hum of the world continuing—the sound a soul might make if it finally learned how to stop repeating itself.
Bio
D. Kavka is a feminist lawyer and social justice advocate working at the intersections of criminal law, human rights, and environmental stewardship.
Chris Kemp-Jackson is a Jamaican-Canadian writer whose work examines grief, care, and the unseen labour carried by women in love and memory.
They are partners in life and in fiction, writing together in Calgary.